I had an initial assessment with a practitioner. First of all they did not introduce themselves or explain their role/ reason for the call, they just went straight into the questions.
When it came to describing my main problem this practitioner cut me off and started explaining what would be most helpful for me without listening to my own goals. Instead pushing me to list a behavioural goal and offering me Step 2 GSH with either Step 3 Counselling or CBT after, which in my own professional experience should not be offered because Step 2 is considered a standalone treatment and a patient should not be stepped up without review and or clinical supervision. Even though I scored 3 on PHQ-9 Q9 they did not complete a safety plan with me ( although according to my treating therapist this practitioner documented that they did).
They then sent myself and my GP an assessment summary letter and rather than giving their own clinical judgment on my main problem, they copied a summary of what I had said in the assessment and reduced my risk score from 3 to 2. They also signed the letter only with their name and no job title, so I still have no idea whether they are a PWP or CBT therapist.
I am aware that there are difficult time constraints and asking clinicians to assess in 30 mins seems very unreasonable and unsafe especially as several others IAPT services offer double the time for assessment however as a clinician myself I am very concerned about the standard of assessment I received. I hope this feedback improves the quality of care your service is providing.
"Concerned about an assessment with Ealing IAPT"
About: Ealing IAPT Ealing IAPT London W13 8RA
Posted by Wellbeing123 (as ),
Do you have a similar story to tell?
Tell your story & make a difference ››
Responses
See more responses from Paul Gibbs