This is Care Opinion [siteRegion]. Did you want Care Opinion [usersRegionBasedOnIP]?

"Unable to access appointments"

About: Moorside Surgery

Moorside could be a great practice – it has at least one excellent doctor, some terrific healthcare assistants and some very empathetic and helpful reception staff. However, it is let down by draconian policies with regard to booking appointments, as I experienced when trying to book one for a minor issue in late 2023. "Call at 8 O'clock in the morning" is not just a mantra but an entire philosophy at Moorside. No allowances are made for those of us unable to call at this time of the morning due to disability, sleep disorders or work commitments. This was certainly my experience when I asked in person at the surgery. I even asked about pre-booking an appointment for the Bradford Out-of-Hours Service which their website states they participate in, but I was told I would still have to call early in the morning, albeit a whole hour later. When my wife politely protested the lack of options, the receptionist barked "Don't start!" and retreated behind a screen and could be heard talking about her with colleagues. There is no access whatsoever to pre-bookable appointments through electronic channels (which appears to be unique in north Bradford), just spotty access to the Patchs messaging system, only erratically and during working hours – again, extremely unhelpful for those of us that don't keep conventional hours. This is staggeringly backward-looking and archaic in the wider context of a 21st-century National Health Service that is increasingly embracing digital services. Apparently the reason for this is that the practice previously wasted money and resources through missed pre-booked appointments. Neither my wife nor I have ever missed a single pre-booked appointment with any previous practice, so why should we be tarred with the same generalising, condescending brush? It also seems a ludicrously inefficient use of resources and communication channels, as the daily 8am scrum must mean some patients who genuinely need urgent treatment will be pushed aside in favour of others who have a minor condition where a pre-bookable appointment 2-3 weeks hence would be perfectly acceptable.The outgoing message when calling the surgery even suggests you may be denied access to primary care should you be unable to call at 8am, which I strongly believe to be in direct contravention of The Equality Act 2010 given that many protected characteristics would preclude this. My wife and I are both in the process of leaving for another surgery as we essentially have zero access to primary care. This is simply unacceptable.

nhs.uk logo
Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Moorside Surgery last month
Moorside Surgery
Submitted on 12/04/2024 at 10:36
Published on nhs.uk at 10:36


As this post is anonymous I am unable to fully investigate but do take your comments seriously. The booking of GP appointments has become more complex over the years and we are constantly reviewing our systems and evaluating patient feedback. We work closely with our neighbouring surgeries and meet monthly to discuss our access plans, review our data and try look at best practice. We are being forced down a 'digital' pathway with the introduction of Patchs, NHS Apps, Cloud based telephony, Care Navigation and many other new systems. On an average month we take over 5000 phone calls and in the past 3 months our average monthly appointments are 5177. We appreciate that the 8am system is not ideal and are looking to introduce some pre bookable appointments - however our patient feedback does imply that overall we are doing a good job in what can only be described as unprecedented times. We are sorry to hear that you are leaving us and hope that your new surgery can meet your needs. However if you would prefer to discuss options we would be happy to talk to you.

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k