This is Care Opinion [siteRegion]. Did you want Care Opinion [usersRegionBasedOnIP]?

"Disappointing "

About: St Mary's Hospital (HQ) (London)

Visited the A&E yesterday with what I consider serious issues. There seems to be such waste of time at the initial stage of the process. In total, 5 NHS personnel spoke to me (one took blood samples) before I saw a doctor. That makes 6. Where is the efficiency in that? Appearing to move patients through the system and actually doing so is different.

Lastly, when I was inquiring about a treatment that I was unfamiliar with, it was seen as an affront to the capabilities of the team. Yet, a grave error was made by not labelling a supposed iron transfusion treatment (IV) with my personal details. Who does that? How can a patient trust treatment plans when it is not taken seriously?

Time will be saved and more patients catered for if the unnecessary process of speaking to multiple personnel is removed - just saying. All this delays much needed treatment.

nhs.uk logo
Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from St Mary's Hospital (HQ) last month
St Mary's Hospital (HQ)
Submitted on 21/03/2024 at 07:58
Published on nhs.uk at 07:59


Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust is concerned about your posting on NHS Choices and wishes to apologise to you for your experience. If you would like to discuss this matter further, please contact the Patient Advice and Liaison Service (PALS) on either 0203 312 7777 or email imperial.pals@nhs.net . In the meantime I have forwarded your posting to the Managers.

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k