The nursing staff were fabulous - they couldn't have been more friendly, efficient and supportive.
The only negative part of the experience (aside from the procedure itself!) was the fact that the surgeon who conducted my procedure, insisted on my having a canula in place just in case an intravenous drug was required, which it was not. This was not only unnecessarily uncomfortable, it was also a shocking waste of resources. A huge pile of waste plastic was generated, amongst other things. It took the nurse no more than two minutes to insert the canula, so I can't help thinking that it would not have been too much of a disruption should it have been necessary to stop the procedure to insert it. The fact that some surgeons want it in place as a precautionary measure and others don't strongly suggests that it is not strictly necessary.
My request is that in matters of resource consumption and waste generation, the individual preference of the surgeon should not prevail in a case like this, but that procedures are ALL regulated with a view to using the minimum resources possible. Safeguarding our health should not pollute the planet - particularly not at the whim of a doctor.
"My endoscopy experience"
About: Queen Margaret Hospital / Endoscopy Queen Margaret Hospital Endoscopy KY12 0SU
Posted by saturnqp95 (as ),
Do you have a similar story to tell?
Tell your story & make a difference ››
Responses
See more responses from Donna Hughes
See more responses from Neil Cruickshank