I received a letter stating that I was "guaranteed" to have surgery performed on my leg before the end of the month.
I called the waiting list co-ordinator to ask for an update and was informed that the secretary who works for the surgeon due to operate on me was off work sick.
However, the woman I spoke to told me that the "guarantee" was simply sent to full fill criteria set by the government. I was told that these targets were "completely unrealistic and not met by any of the orthopaedic surgeons" at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital.
Thus, I believe I am extremely unlikely to have my surgery as "guaranteed".
As a result of the "guarantee", I have kept my schedule clear for 12 weeks - this has included missing a family wedding in America.
I am angry, frustrated and upset that I was provided with a "guarantee" that it's apparently known to be unrealistic (by staff).
If the staff at the QEH are unable to keep to these guarantees then what is the purpose of informing the patients of a set deadline?
All that has been achieved in this situation is that I have been left angry and disappointed. I would have benefited from a more realistic, honest time scale of when the surgery was likely to be. Providing unrealistic "guarantees" does nothing to benefit the patient.
I am currently left with no idea of when the surgery is likely to be (surgeon's secretary will contact me on return to work) - meaning that I need to keep my diary free for the foreseeable future.
"I would have benefited from a more realistic, honest time scale"
About: Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow / Bones, joint and fractures Queen Elizabeth University Hospital Glasgow Bones, joint and fractures Glasgow G51 4TF
Posted by Leyla2108 (as ),
Do you have a similar story to tell?
Tell your story & make a difference ››
Responses
See more responses from Nicole McInally
See more responses from Nicole McInally
Update posted by Leyla2108 (the patient) 7 years ago
See more responses from Nicole McInally