Text size

Theme

Language

"Disjointed Care"

About: Glasgow Royal Infirmary / Accident & Emergency Glasgow Royal Infirmary / Acute/Medical Receiving Unit (50,51,53) Glasgow Royal Infirmary / Neurology

(as the patient),

After a first unexplained seizure a few years ago, I had many more this year, a few requiring A&E visits, 2 admissions, and the disjointed care and long waiting list almost cost me my life recently. 

Suddenly had increase in frequency and was admitted twice from A&E to Ward 50-53. The treatment in A&E was dismissive, but the communication and disjointed care meant that I was admitted twice from A&E for what was said to be overnight observation. Both resulted in a 5-day stay in Ward50-Ward 53, the second admission I was transferred to a different Ward where my experience was a lot better.

In Ward 50-53, I’d have little to no information, different doctors every time who had a different story every time. I understand it’s not a Neurology department, but I’d had a label of dissociative seizures added to my record without knowledge, with no discussion or mention of this by any doctor. No imaging or EEG to confirm. I was started on anti epileptics, on a low dose titration plan, that would amount to an ineffective final dose. Referrals were supposedly made to first fit clinic, but once again, my medical record states otherwise.

It was my second admission, in the second ward I was transferred to, where I received much better care, and was guided in a better direction.

No MRI or EEG, but better idea of what was going on and given additional treatment, and from there I have the first fit clinic referral recorded. This was in June.

No contact from MRI or neurology at all, little guidance or help. I was continuing to have less severe seizures, but they did continue. Letter for MRI appointment did come through - I ended up not being able to attend and couldn’t contact the service, due to being intubated abroad for status epilepticus. whilst abroad on what was supposed to be a 5-day holiday, I spent 22 days bouncing between 3 different ICUs with prolonged seizures, 2 instances of status epilepticus requiring intubation. EEGs showed interictal epileptiform activity. It was explained to me that the medication I was on wasn’t sufficient, and that it was likely my epilepsy was worsening due to being under treated, and possibly dismissed due to an initial diagnosis or label on my record as it being dissociative.

I feel the disjointed care, lack of communication between teams, misinformed decisions, long waiting time for secondary care, and the lack of guidance I was receiving from Glasgow Royal whilst inpatient and in A&E, as well as the lack of communication from Neurology, significantly contributed to the decline in my health and ultimately the events of my holiday.

I’ve had many experiences with Glasgow Royal, and have to say that this would be my only majorly negative experience. A&E staff are mostly lovely, and Ward 8 I received excellent care and was well looked after, despite being a very different case to the wards specialty. 

I’m sharing my story to highlight the need for a review of streamlining and pathways from A&E, not making assumptions, the need for improvement in secondary care waiting times, and just more guidance for patients before discharge where they ultimately wait in the dark until they are seen. 

Do you have a similar story to tell? Tell your story & make a difference ››

Responses

Response from Kristoffer Robertson, Clinical Services Manger, Emergency Department and Acute Assessment - North Sector, NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde less than an hour ago
Kristoffer Robertson
Clinical Services Manger, Emergency Department and Acute Assessment - North Sector,
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
Submitted on 27/10/2025 at 12:04
Published on Care Opinion at 12:04


Thank you for taking the time to share your experience in such detail. We are truly sorry to hear about the challenges you have faced, the distressing nature of your seizures, and the difficulties you encountered while under our care at Glasgow Royal Infirmary. Your feedback highlights concerns about communication, continuity of care, and follow-up support — and we completely understand how frustrating and worrying this must have been for you.

It is unacceptable that you felt uninformed and unsupported during your admissions and following discharge. Clear communication, collaborative decision-making, and timely access to specialist follow-up are essential parts of safe and compassionate care. We are also sorry that you experienced inconsistencies in information provided by different staff and that your diagnosis and treatment plan were not discussed with you as they should have been.

We appreciate you recognising the positive care you received from the A&E team and the staff in Ward 8, and we will ensure that your kind comments are shared with them. However, the wider issues you have raised — particularly regarding communication between departments, referral processes, and the management of neurological conditions — are of great concern.

Thank you again for taking the time to share your story and for doing so constructively. We truly value your insight and your suggestions on improving patient pathways, discharge support, and coordination between A&E and specialist services. Your experience will help us identify where changes are needed to provide better care and communication for future patients.

Take Care

Kristoffer Robertson

Clinical Service Manager

Emergency Care and Acute Receiving

  • {{helpful}} {{helpful == 1 ? "person thinks" : "people think"}} this response is helpful
Opinions
Next Response j
Previous Response k